When Diana was asked by her interview Martin Bashir about how she prepared for royal life, she answered: "At the age of 19, you always think you're prepared for everything, and you think you have the knowledge of what's coming ahead. Below are just some of the most striking parallels between the two, which may help us understand how Diana's legacy shaped Harry and Meghan's exit from the royal establishment. Following an inquiry that concluded the broadcaster had fallen short of “high standards of integrity and transparency,” the BBC vowed to never air Diana’s Panorama interview ever again.Īs many viewers have pointed out, the two interviews are similar in many ways, from the topics covered to the revelations about how royal life. In 2022, the BBC apologised for its obtaining of the late Princess of Wales’ infamous sit-down with Bashir. More than 25 years later, her son Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle sat down with Oprah Winfrey to give an equally revealing interview following their departure from the royal family last year.īoth interviews were deemed controversial at the time of airing. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.In 1995, Princess Diana gave her first post-royal interview for a Panorama special with Martin Bashir after her separation from Prince Charles. “He has demonstrated extraordinary commitment to the Gallery and it has been a great pleasure to work closely with him as we have faced the challenges of COVID and as we prepare to mark the Gallery’s Bicentenary in 2024.” “I would like to express my gratitude to Tony Hall for his excellent work as chair of trustees of the National Gallery,” said Gabriele Finaldi, director of the National Gallery. The Gallery is extremely sorry to lose him, but of course we entirely understand and respect his decision.” John Kingman, deputy chair of the National Gallery board of trustees, said: “Tony Hall has been doing a superb job as chair of the National Gallery, where he is much respected and liked. Hall was appointed chair of the board of trustees of the National Gallery in January 2020 on the same day that it was announced that he was stepping down from the BBC director general position. “While Lord Dyson does not criticize my integrity, I am sorry that our investigation failed to meet the standards that were required.” “Throughout my 35-year career at the BBC, I have always acted in ways I believe were fair, impartial and with the public interest front and center,” Hall added. I was wrong to give Martin Bashir the benefit of the doubt, basing that judgment as I did on what appeared to be deep remorse on his part.” “In hindsight, there were further steps we could and should have taken following complaints about Martin Bashir’s conduct. “I have read Lord Dyson’s report, and I accept that our investigation 25 years ago into how ‘Panorama’ secured the interview with Princess Diana fell well short of what was required,” Hall had said. Reacting to the Dyson report, Hall had issued a statement on May 21. The 127-page report notes that Hall’s investigation into the matter at the time was “woefully ineffective.” The findings of the Lord Dyson inquiry, which were published May 20, were also particularly critical of the role played by Hall, then the BBC’s head of news and current affairs. “As I said two days ago, I am very sorry for the events of 25 years ago and I believe leadership means taking responsibility.”Īn independent investigation into a 1995 BBC Panorama interview with Princess Diana, conducted by journalist Martin Bashir, had found that the public broadcaster “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |